Can somebody help me on this thank you it will mean a lot. Examine the two advertisement above. In your opinion, is advertisement, like the two above, a form of art? Use terms and concepts from the lesson to s A regulation hockey puck is in the shape of a night circular cylinder and has a 3-inch diameter. Which measurement is closest to the circumference of What is the scale factor of the following figure which shows triangle A dilated to triangle B?
Read each question and choose the best answer. Here is a general sequence of events in the development of the Renaissance. Which statement BEST compl Car Survey In a survey of 1, people who owned a certain type of car, said they would buy that type of car again.
What percent of the people su A characteristic of a substance that can be observed and measured without changing the identity of the substance is called a? Read the paragraph. In the s, Henry Clay took part in key events of US history. He was one of the War Hawks who called for war with Great B I need help with this, find the measure of each lettered angle, show work.
What is the value of x? How did the Fredonian Rebellion create tension between the Texas colonists and the Mexican government? By requiring Anglo colonists declare their More questions: Mathematics Another questions. Questions on the website: See results 0 The answer is not found? Log in Forgot your password? Join now Forgot your password? You are registered. Access to your account will be opened after verification and publication of the question.
Being imaginative in science means trying to discover new things using weird methods that have some scientific value because of their physical properties. For example, trying to see what's a good conductor so you put a provide electricity through a pizza to see what happens.
It might be great, it might be bad, either way, pizza can conduct electricity. Pseudo science would be trying to turn pizza into gold like what Alchemists did. Being imaginative in doing science means combining science and art. It relies on the imagination and creativity of person but still working within the confines of the scientific laws and principles. Being imaginative in doing science is using your knowledge and creativity to make innovative ideas, while psuedoscience is using sources that are not true and do not use actual science.
Example being ads that say "Wow you will not believe what how this oil cured cancer! Before we can determine what the difference between being imaginative in science and pseudoscience is, we have to determine what the difference between science and pseudoscience is.
The aim of science is to challenge claims that are made as well as look for evidence that might prove the claims wrong. Pseudoscience is the opposite. It looks for evidence to support the claims that are made. There is no need to be imaginative in science. The data speaks for itself. Pseudoscience is, again, the opposite of science. It is sometimes necessary for one to be imaginative to draw conclusions in pseudoscience.
For example, trying to see what's a good conductor so you put a provide electricity through a pizza to see what happens. It might be great, it might be bad, either way, pizza can conduct electricity. Pseudo science would be trying to turn pizza into gold like what Alchemists did. Answer from: yedida.
I am guessing that the difference is that doing science is actually going through the process and pseudoscience is more of coming up with a hypothesis. It is more of making mistakes. You cant be imaginative in doing science bc you will need facts and the real thing. Answer from: ilovemusicandreading.
Imagination is the ability of a man to form mental images without using any senses. Answer from: keyonaemanieevans. Are you sure this belongs in the mathematics section. Answer from: drewje Before we can determine what the difference between being imaginative in science and pseudoscience is, we have to determine what the difference between science and pseudoscience is.
The aim of science is to challenge claims that are made as well as look for evidence that might prove the claims wrong. Pseudoscience is the opposite. It looks for evidence to support the claims that are made. There is no need to be imaginative in science. The data speaks for itself.
Pseudoscience is, again, the opposite of science. It is sometimes necessary for one to be imaginative to draw conclusions in pseudoscience. Answer from: ChronicGamingRB. Being imaginative in doing science is using your knowledge and creativity to make innovative ideas, while psuedoscience is using sources that are not true and do not use actual science.
Example being ads that say "Wow you will not believe what how this oil cured cancer!
0コメント